知识库

Eye(FR) → Mill(skill) → Library(/app)

← 返回列表
Hacker News · 2026-05-16 · 已成文 · 来源 file

围绕「Ask HN: Onboarding LLMs or Students?」:从 agent/MCP/harness/成本与工程化视角抽取可迁移结论,并落到可执行动作。

为什么重要

收藏=处理集;无 ka 即断档。Mode B 1:1 补回 star→文章链路。

正文

围绕「Ask HN: Onboarding LLMs or Students?」:从 agent/MCP/harness/成本与工程化视角抽取可迁移结论,并落到可执行动作。

Claim

围绕「Ask HN: Onboarding LLMs or Students?」:从 agent/MCP/harness/成本与工程化视角抽取可迁移结论,并落到可执行动作。

Why it matters

收藏=处理集;无 ka 即断档。Mode B 1:1 补回 star→文章链路。

Summary

Mode B 回补:FR favorite + Vault 无 ka-v0。 标题:Ask HN: Onboarding LLMs or Students?

Actions

  • (none)

Evidence

  • (none)

Caveats

  • (none)

Research queries

  • (none)

Body

正文

背景

FR 收藏条目《Ask HN: Onboarding LLMs or Students?》曾在批量清未读时只 mark_read、未走沉淀;Mode B 从 favorite 无 ka 队列回补。

机制

原文:https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48158340
收藏 id:1778922927851296
从标题/摘要与领域关键词提炼 claim;evidence 至少含原文 + 公开相关页。

取舍

优先可迁移工程动作,避免八卦/额度刷屏;弱信号走 shallow。

动作

打开原文核对;把 claim 并入 harness/MCP/成本基线;需要时再 Exa 加厚杂志长文。

结合的源文章

主源
Ask HN: Onboarding LLMs or Students?
打开原文 ↗

原文快照

展开 / 收起快照

As a professor trying to build an onboarding and orchestrating systems for LLMs, the strong idea that is rising in my mind is the need to have a mental model to transmit through language.

There are two fundamentally different regimens depending of what is the goal: learning or just passing grades. If the goal is learning, the system should help you find the final answer, wherever when it is passing grades the system should gives you something like: this is the minimum viable structure to solve problems of type X, something similar to recipes.

Regimen-dependent prompt architecture

If regimen = LEARNING:

    LLM receives: "Never provide a final answer first. Always ask a question that moves thinking forward. If the student asks for a recipe, explain why that would undermine the goal. Reward reasoning traces over correct conclusions."

    Outputs look like: "What do you think happens at the boundary here?"
If regimen = PASSING GRADES:

    LLM receives: "Provide minimal viable structures. Assume the user needs to complete a known problem type efficiently. Prioritize clarity, completeness, and reproducibility over depth. Do not ask exploratory questions unless the user fails twice."

    Outputs look like: "For problem type X, the recipe is: (1) identify variables A,B,C; (2) apply formula D; (3) check condition E. Example attached."

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48158340

Points: 2

# Comments: 1